ZSB vs. CMDY
Compare and contrast key facts about USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY).
ZSB and CMDY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZSB is a passively managed fund by USCF that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Electric Vehicle Meals Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2023. CMDY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. Both ZSB and CMDY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZSB vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZSB vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund | 5.29% | 64.34% | -19.70% | -31.38% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 24.02% | 15.81% | 5.43% | -6.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSB achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 24.02% return.
ZSB
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 33.68%
- 1Y
- 52.55%
- 3Y*
- 0.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 9.23%
- YTD
- 24.02%
- 6M
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- 31.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZSB vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSB has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZSB vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
ZSB
CMDY
ZSB vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSB | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.89 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 2.47 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.30 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 10.33 | -2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSB | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.89 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.56 | -0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSB and CMDY is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZSB vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
ZSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than CMDY's 10.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund | 0.87% | 0.92% | 2.96% | 3.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.40% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
ZSB vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSB drawdown since its inception was -49.26%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSB and CMDY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSB | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.26% | -31.19% | -18.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -7.73% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.23% | 0.00% | -11.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -13.37% | -18.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 3.06% | +3.35% |
Volatility
ZSB vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) has a higher volatility of 11.89% compared to iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) at 7.04%. This indicates that ZSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZSB | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.89% | 7.04% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.62% | 13.19% | +9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.76% | 16.57% | +10.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 15.66% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 14.56% | +5.21% |