ZSB vs. TILL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ZSB (USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund) and TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSB is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P GSCI Electric Vehicle Meals Index, while TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. ZSB is passively managed, while TILL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZSB returned 1.91%/yr vs -8.91%/yr for TILL. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZSB charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TILL.

Performance

ZSB vs. TILL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSB achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly higher than TILL's 2.85% return.

ZSB

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: -7.84%
• YTD: 4.41%
• 6M: 6.25%
• 1Y: 59.70%
• 3Y*: 1.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TILL

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: 2.85%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: -3.91%
• 3Y*: -8.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSB vs. TILL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund	4.41%	64.34%	-19.70%	-31.38%
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	2.85%	-5.97%	-13.98%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSB and TILL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023	0.10

Return for Risk

ZSB vs. TILL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSB

ZSB Risk / Return Rank: 71
ZSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ZSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ZSB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ZSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ZSB Martin Ratio Rank: 59

TILL

TILL Risk / Return Rank: 6
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSB vs. TILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZSB	TILL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	-0.31	+2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	-0.37	+3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.96	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	-0.41	+3.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.56	-0.80	+10.35

ZSB vs. TILL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the TILL Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSB and TILL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZSB vs. TILL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSB drawdown since its inception was -49.26%, which is greater than TILL's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSB and TILL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZSB	TILL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.26%	-33.76%	-15.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-9.60%	-7.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.22%	-29.46%	-13.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.97%	-30.98%	+19.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.58%	-21.48%	-9.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.27%	4.93%	+1.34%

Volatility

ZSB vs. TILL - Volatility Comparison

USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) at 2.83%. This indicates that ZSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZSB	TILL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	2.83%	+2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.46%	10.35%	+12.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.67%	12.65%	+14.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.62%	14.69%	+4.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.62%	14.69%	+4.93%

ZSB vs. TILL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSB has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TILL's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZSB vs. TILL - Dividend Comparison

ZSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than TILL's 4.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.83%	4.97%	2.55%	51.24%	0.73%
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund	0.88%	0.92%	2.96%	3.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZSB and TILL in my portfolio?

ZSB and TILL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZSB or TILL?

ZSB has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to TILL (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSB dropped -49.26% vs TILL's -33.76%.

Which ETF is better, ZSB or TILL?

On 3-year performance, ZSB leads with 1.91% vs -8.91% for TILL. On fees, ZSB is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZSB or TILL?

Over the 3-year period, ZSB has performed better with a 1.91% return vs -8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZSB or TILL?

ZSB is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZSB or TILL?

TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.88% for ZSB.

What is the main difference between ZSB and TILL?

ZSB is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while TILL is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ZSB and 0.89% for TILL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.