ZROZ vs. RVER
ZROZ (PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund) and RVER (Trenchless Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZROZ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index, while RVER is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by River1. ZROZ is passively managed, while RVER is actively managed. Over the past year, ZROZ returned -7.54% vs 12.45% for RVER. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ZROZ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RVER.
Performance
ZROZ vs. RVER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZROZ achieves a -7.23% return, which is significantly lower than RVER's 9.01% return.
ZROZ
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- 6M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- -7.23%
- 1Y
- -7.54%
- 3Y*
- -8.06%
- 5Y*
- -14.47%
- 10Y*
- -5.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.69%
RVER
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 12.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $328.24K | $287.25K | $279.54K | |
| $41.31M | $45.82M | $40.38M |
ZROZ vs. RVER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | -7.23% | -1.84% | -6.04% |
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF | 9.01% | 5.68% | 18.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZROZ and RVER is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZROZ vs. RVER — Risk / Return Rank
ZROZ
RVER
ZROZ vs. RVER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) and Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZROZ | RVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.09 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.50 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 1.26 | -2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZROZ vs. RVER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZROZ drawdown since its inception was -62.93%, which is greater than RVER's maximum drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZROZ and RVER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZROZ | RVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.93% | -26.21% | -36.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -21.61% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.42% | -10.41% | -52.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.38% | -6.11% | -18.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | 8.54% | -1.36% |
Volatility
ZROZ vs. RVER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) is 4.20%, while Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a volatility of 8.55%. This indicates that ZROZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZROZ | RVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 8.55% | -4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 20.01% | -8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 24.36% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 26.42% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 26.42% | -4.46% |
ZROZ vs. RVER - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZROZ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RVER's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZROZ vs. RVER - Dividend Comparison
ZROZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than RVER's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF | 1.56% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | 5.59% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 1.68% | 2.22% | 2.06% | 2.53% | 3.00% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZROZ and RVER have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVER has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to ZROZ (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZROZ dropped -62.93% vs RVER's -26.21%.
On 1-year performance, RVER leads with 12.45% vs -7.54% for ZROZ. On fees, ZROZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZROZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RVER has performed better with a 12.45% return vs -7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZROZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RVER.
ZROZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 1.56% for RVER.
ZROZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while RVER is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and River1. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZROZ and 0.65% for RVER.
RVER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZROZ and RVER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer