ZROZ vs. RVER
ZROZ (PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund) and RVER (Trenchless Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZROZ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index, while RVER is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by River1. ZROZ is passively managed, while RVER is actively managed. Over the past year, ZROZ returned 3.89% vs 24.60% for RVER. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZROZ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RVER.
Performance
ZROZ vs. RVER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZROZ achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than RVER's 18.77% return.
ZROZ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- -7.39%
- 5Y*
- -11.62%
- 10Y*
- -4.15%
RVER
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 22.28%
- YTD
- 18.77%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 24.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZROZ vs. RVER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | -1.07% | -1.84% | -5.87% |
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF | 18.77% | 5.68% | 17.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZROZ and RVER is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2024 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZROZ vs. RVER — Risk / Return Rank
ZROZ
RVER
ZROZ vs. RVER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) and Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZROZ | RVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 1.14 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 3.13 | -2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZROZ | RVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 1.09 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.75 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
ZROZ vs. RVER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZROZ drawdown since its inception was -62.93%, which is greater than RVER's maximum drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZROZ and RVER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZROZ | RVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.93% | -26.21% | -36.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.02% | -21.61% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.93% | -2.38% | -57.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.04% | -5.95% | -18.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 7.88% | -1.76% |
Volatility
ZROZ vs. RVER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) is 4.46%, while Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that ZROZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZROZ | RVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 8.42% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 18.39% | -7.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 22.60% | -6.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 26.40% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 26.40% | -4.34% |
ZROZ vs. RVER - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZROZ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RVER's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZROZ vs. RVER - Dividend Comparison
ZROZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than RVER's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF | 1.44% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | 5.15% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 1.68% | 2.22% | 2.06% | 2.53% | 3.00% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZROZ and RVER have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVER has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to ZROZ (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZROZ dropped -62.93% vs RVER's -26.21%.
On 1-year performance, RVER leads with 24.60% vs 3.89% for ZROZ. On fees, ZROZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZROZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RVER has performed better with a 24.60% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZROZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RVER.
ZROZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 1.44% for RVER.
ZROZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while RVER is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and River1. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZROZ and 0.65% for RVER.
RVER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZROZ and RVER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer