ZRE.TO vs. RISN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZRE.TO (BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF) and RISN (Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while RISN is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Inspire. ZRE.TO is passively managed, while RISN is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZRE.TO returned 3.45%/yr vs 7.55%/yr for RISN. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZRE.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for RISN.

Performance

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ZRE.TO is traded in CAD, while RISN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RISN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZRE.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than RISN's 7.86% return.

ZRE.TO

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 11.30%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: 6.80%

RISN

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 6.58%
• YTD: 7.86%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 17.10%
• 3Y*: 13.39%
• 5Y*: 7.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ZRE.TO BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF	9.53%	11.21%	2.82%	0.84%	-17.80%	33.96%	11.80%
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF	7.86%	5.75%	16.85%	7.86%	-12.22%	21.37%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ZRE.TO and RISN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020	0.27

The correlation between ZRE.TO and RISN shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (5 years) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZRE.TO	RISN
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	2.7%
Communication Services	-	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.6%
Energy	-	6.8%
Financial Services	-	22.2%
Healthcare	-	4.5%
Industrials	-	27.1%
Technology	-	18.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ZRE.TO vs. RISN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZRE.TO

ZRE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 29
ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ZRE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ZRE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ZRE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ZRE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 29

RISN

RISN Risk / Return Rank: 39
RISN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RISN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RISN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RISN Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
RISN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZRE.TO	RISN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.42	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	2.03	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.25	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	2.31	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.29	6.52	-2.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the RISN Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZRE.TO and RISN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZRE.TO	RISN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	1.42	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.68	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.70	-0.18

Drawdowns

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than RISN's maximum drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZRE.TO and RISN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZRE.TO	RISN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.29%	-16.53%	-29.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.07%	-7.43%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.16%	-14.88%	-2.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.52%	-16.53%	-15.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	0.00%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	-5.99%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.63%	+0.01%

Volatility

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) is 2.83%, while Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that ZRE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RISN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZRE.TO	RISN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	3.76%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.39%	9.89%	-1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.09%	12.11%	-1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.55%	11.16%	+4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	11.05%	+6.63%

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than RISN's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZRE.TO vs. RISN - Dividend Comparison

ZRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than RISN's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF	1.03%	0.98%	1.39%	2.05%	1.27%	9.74%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZRE.TO BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF	4.42%	4.90%	5.19%	5.07%	4.90%	3.82%	4.95%	4.11%	4.89%	4.98%	5.39%	5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZRE.TO and RISN in my portfolio?

ZRE.TO and RISN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZRE.TO or RISN?

On fees, ZRE.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZRE.TO or RISN?

ZRE.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for RISN.

What is the main difference between ZRE.TO and RISN?

ZRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while RISN is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZRE.TO and 0.82% for RISN.