PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZQQ.TO vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZQQ.TO is traded in CAD, while VGT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VGT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZQQ.TO achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 34.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 20.08%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.83% annualized return.


ZQQ.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
10.63%
YTD
19.82%
6M
18.08%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
20.08%

VGT

1D
0.00%
1M
21.74%
YTD
34.77%
6M
31.42%
1Y
63.98%
3Y*
35.52%
5Y*
25.99%
10Y*
26.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
19.82%18.38%24.00%52.52%-33.75%26.68%45.33%37.08%-2.29%31.51%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
33.32%16.19%40.41%49.30%-24.69%29.27%43.58%41.32%11.15%28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ZQQ.TO and VGT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010

0.83

The correlation between ZQQ.TO and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZQQ.TO
VGT

Technology

54.1%
98.5%

Communication Services

15.5%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Healthcare

4.2%
0.0%

Industrials

3.1%
0.4%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.0%

Energy

0.6%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

ZQQ.TO
54.1%
VGT
98.5%

Communication Services

ZQQ.TO
15.5%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ZQQ.TO
12.2%
VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

ZQQ.TO
7.6%
VGT

-

Healthcare

ZQQ.TO
4.2%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

ZQQ.TO
3.1%
VGT
0.4%

Utilities

ZQQ.TO
1.4%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

ZQQ.TO
1.2%
VGT
0.0%

Energy

ZQQ.TO
0.6%
VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

ZQQ.TO
0.2%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

ZQQ.TO
0.1%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZQQ.TOVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.53

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.87

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.25

11.00

+0.24

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZQQ.TO and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZQQ.TOVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

3.19

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.11

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

1.17

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.15

-0.24

Drawdowns

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -31.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZQQ.TOVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.39%

-31.23%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-16.61%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-27.77%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-31.23%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-31.23%

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-5.10%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

5.83%

-2.40%

Volatility

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) is 4.54%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that ZQQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZQQ.TOVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

5.97%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

15.78%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

20.21%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.57%

23.54%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

23.08%

-0.67%

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZQQ.TO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
0.22%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZQQ.TO and VGT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.

ZQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VGT is Technology Equities. ZQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZQQ.TO and 0.09% for VGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZQQ.TO and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer