PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (ZPRI.DE) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZPRI.DE is traded in EUR, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRI.DE achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 29.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPRI.DE has underperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 4.82%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.32% annualized return.


ZPRI.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.06%
YTD
6.71%
6M
7.29%
1Y
11.92%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
4.82%

EIMI.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
8.72%
YTD
29.63%
6M
31.71%
1Y
51.55%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPRI.DE
SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
6.71%1.94%8.86%3.53%-7.87%14.36%-1.90%20.85%1.57%-1.34%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
29.63%16.48%14.45%7.70%-14.70%6.78%9.01%19.00%-10.15%20.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRI.DE and EIMI.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2015

0.37

The correlation between ZPRI.DE and EIMI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRI.DE
ZPRI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ZPRI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (ZPRI.DE) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPRI.DEEIMI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.50

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

4.89

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

16.89

-6.59

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRI.DE and EIMI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRI.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.82%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRI.DE and EIMI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRI.DEEIMI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.82%

-34.88%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.37%

-10.72%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

-18.31%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.83%

-22.33%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.82%

-32.18%

+9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.98%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-9.24%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

3.11%

-1.99%

Volatility

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (ZPRI.DE) is 2.25%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that ZPRI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRI.DEEIMI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

7.56%

-5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.41%

16.85%

-11.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.08%

19.44%

-12.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.92%

17.11%

-7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

18.54%

-3.71%

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRI.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRI.DE vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

ZPRI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPRI.DE
SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
2.86%2.99%2.76%2.78%2.54%1.89%2.23%2.29%2.18%2.36%0.98%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRI.DE and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZPRI.DE.

ZPRI.DE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. ZPRI.DE tracks Morningstar Global Multi-Asset Infrastructure, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ZPRI.DE and 0.18% for EIMI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRI.DE and EIMI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer