ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZPDS.DE (SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF) and GLUX.DE (Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - ZPDS.DE tracks the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector while GLUX.DE tracks the S&P Global Luxury. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPDS.DE returned 6.84%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for GLUX.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPDS.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GLUX.DE.

Performance

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDS.DE achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than GLUX.DE's -7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPDS.DE has underperformed GLUX.DE with an annualized return of 6.84%, while GLUX.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return.

ZPDS.DE

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 0.43%
• 3Y*: 4.36%
• 5Y*: 6.72%
• 10Y*: 6.84%

GLUX.DE

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 4.80%
• YTD: -7.03%
• 6M: -6.01%
• 1Y: 2.52%
• 3Y*: -0.97%
• 5Y*: 0.25%
• 10Y*: 9.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZPDS.DE SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF	7.50%	-8.90%	20.38%	-5.08%	5.38%	26.65%	-0.79%	29.96%	-4.12%	-1.59%
GLUX.DE Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR	-7.03%	2.34%	4.43%	11.98%	-19.34%	32.41%	23.80%	33.53%	-9.13%	22.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDS.DE and GLUX.DE is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015	0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between ZPDS.DE and GLUX.DE has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDS.DE

ZPDS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ZPDS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ZPDS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ZPDS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
ZPDS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

GLUX.DE

GLUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
GLUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
GLUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
GLUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
GLUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZPDS.DE	GLUX.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	0.13	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	0.34	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.04	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	0.16	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.10	0.39	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDS.DE and GLUX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZPDS.DE	GLUX.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	0.13	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.01	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.45	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.44	+0.04

Drawdowns

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDS.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.29%, smaller than the maximum GLUX.DE drawdown of -43.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDS.DE and GLUX.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZPDS.DE	GLUX.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.29%	-43.20%	+19.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.74%	-16.00%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.44%	-27.94%	+12.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.54%	-30.52%	+13.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.29%	-43.20%	+19.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.67%	-14.70%	+7.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-9.35%	+3.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	6.51%	-2.24%

Volatility

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) at 5.55%. This indicates that ZPDS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLUX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZPDS.DE	GLUX.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	5.55%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	15.60%	-4.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	19.60%	-5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.37%	21.08%	-7.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.98%	20.94%	-6.96%

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDS.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLUX.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZPDS.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPDS.DE nor GLUX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZPDS.DE and GLUX.DE in my portfolio?

ZPDS.DE and GLUX.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZPDS.DE or GLUX.DE?

On fees, ZPDS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZPDS.DE or GLUX.DE?

ZPDS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GLUX.DE.

What is the main difference between ZPDS.DE and GLUX.DE?

ZPDS.DE tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector, while GLUX.DE tracks S&P Global Luxury. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDS.DE and 0.25% for GLUX.DE.