ZNQ.TO vs. QTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) and QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - ZNQ.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while QTR tracks the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZNQ.TO returned 29.76%/yr vs 24.36%/yr for QTR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZNQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QTR.

Performance

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ZNQ.TO is traded in CAD, while QTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZNQ.TO achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than QTR's 19.14% return.

ZNQ.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 13.05%
• YTD: 22.76%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 42.93%
• 3Y*: 29.76%
• 5Y*: 20.92%
• 10Y*: —

QTR

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 12.72%
• YTD: 19.14%
• 6M: 15.27%
• 1Y: 35.48%
• 3Y*: 24.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF	22.76%	14.60%	35.84%	51.32%	-28.06%	6.71%
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF	19.14%	9.27%	31.89%	42.32%	-24.95%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ZNQ.TO and QTR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.83

The correlation between ZNQ.TO and QTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZNQ.TO	QTR
Technology	54.1%	53.8%
Communication Services	15.5%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	3.1%	2.8%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZNQ.TO

ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

QTR

QTR Risk / Return Rank: 64
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZNQ.TO	QTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	2.58	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	3.44	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.46	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	2.82	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	8.13	+2.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the QTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZNQ.TO and QTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZNQ.TO	QTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.75	2.58	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	0.86	+0.20

Drawdowns

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, which is greater than QTR's maximum drawdown of -27.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZNQ.TO and QTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZNQ.TO	QTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.09%	-27.11%	-4.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.50%	-12.62%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.67%	-20.19%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.63%	-7.81%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	4.38%	-0.42%

Volatility

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZNQ.TO	QTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	4.45%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	10.41%	+1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	13.85%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.81%	16.97%	+3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.34%	16.97%	+5.37%

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZNQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZNQ.TO vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison

ZNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than QTR's 15.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF	15.96%	18.77%	0.50%	0.53%	0.36%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF	0.20%	0.25%	0.30%	0.35%	0.23%	0.12%	0.47%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZNQ.TO and QTR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ZNQ.TO and QTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ZNQ.TO or QTR?

On fees, ZNQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZNQ.TO or QTR?

ZNQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.

What is the main difference between ZNQ.TO and QTR?

ZNQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZNQ.TO and 0.60% for QTR.