PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZNOV vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZNOV vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZNOV achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.


ZNOV

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.96%
YTD
2.81%
6M
2.95%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZNOV vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZNOV and GSG is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024

-0.05

The correlation between ZNOV and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZNOV vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZNOV
ZNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ZNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZNOV vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZNOVGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.40

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

5.47

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.22

14.39

+6.83

ZNOV vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZNOV and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZNOVGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.26

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.89

-0.09

+1.98

Drawdowns

ZNOV vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZNOV drawdown since its inception was -3.31%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZNOV and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZNOVGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-89.62%

+86.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-9.46%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-56.95%

+56.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-63.71%

+63.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

3.59%

-3.24%

Volatility

ZNOV vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) is 0.51%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that ZNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZNOVGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

7.65%

-7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

20.42%

-18.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65%

22.95%

-20.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

22.61%

-19.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

22.03%

-18.68%

ZNOV vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZNOV vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZNOV nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZNOV and GSG have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to ZNOV (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZNOV dropped -3.31% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 51.52% vs 7.34% for ZNOV. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ZNOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 51.52% return vs 7.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZNOV.

ZNOV and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZNOV and 0.75% for GSG.

ZNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZNOV and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer