PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZNOV vs. ZAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZNOV vs. ZAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZNOV achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than ZAPR's 3.14% return.


ZNOV

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.29%
YTD
2.72%
6M
2.76%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZAPR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.08%
YTD
3.14%
6M
3.18%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZNOV vs. ZAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZNOV and ZAPR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025

0.60

The correlation between ZNOV and ZAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZNOV vs. ZAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZNOV
ZNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ZNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAPR
ZAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ZAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZNOV vs. ZAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZNOVZAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

2.24

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

17.39

-13.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.92

80.28

-60.36

ZNOV vs. ZAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is lower than the ZAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZNOV and ZAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZNOV vs. ZAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZNOV drawdown since its inception was -3.31%, which is greater than ZAPR's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZNOV and ZAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZNOVZAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-1.72%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-0.40%

-1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.17%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.09%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.09%

+0.26%

Volatility

ZNOV vs. ZAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR) at 0.51%. This indicates that ZNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZNOVZAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.51%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

1.10%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72%

1.48%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.36%

2.49%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

2.49%

+0.87%

ZNOV vs. ZAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZNOV and ZAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

ZNOV vs. ZAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZNOV nor ZAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZNOV and ZAPR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZNOV has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to ZAPR (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZNOV dropped -3.31% vs ZAPR's -1.72%.

On 1-year performance, ZNOV leads with 7.01% vs 6.96% for ZAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ZAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZNOV has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZNOV and ZAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

ZNOV and ZAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.74 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZNOV and ZAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer