ZNOV vs. EAPR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ZNOV (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. ZNOV is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, ZNOV returned 7.58% vs 22.51% for EAPR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

ZNOV vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZNOV achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 11.89% return.

ZNOV

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 3.23%
• 1Y: 7.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.71%
• 1Y: 22.51%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 5.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZNOV vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZNOV Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November	2.87%	6.27%	0.76%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	11.89%	14.80%	-2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ZNOV and EAPR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024	0.49

Return for Risk

ZNOV vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZNOV

ZNOV Risk / Return Rank: 89
ZNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ZNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ZNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ZNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ZNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZNOV vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZNOV	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	3.13	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.71	5.38	-0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.87	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.72	7.54	-2.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.31	43.49	-21.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZNOV vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZNOV and EAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZNOV	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	3.13	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.90	0.55	+1.35

Drawdowns

ZNOV vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZNOV drawdown since its inception was -3.31%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZNOV and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZNOV	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-17.65%	+14.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.64%	-3.02%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.37%	-4.07%	+3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	0.52%	-0.17%

Volatility

ZNOV vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) is 0.51%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that ZNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZNOV	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	3.75%	-3.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.91%	6.25%	-4.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65%	7.22%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.35%	10.09%	-6.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.35%	10.02%	-6.67%

ZNOV vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZNOV vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZNOV nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZNOV and EAPR in my portfolio?

ZNOV and EAPR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZNOV or EAPR?

EAPR has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to ZNOV (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZNOV dropped -3.31% vs EAPR's -17.65%.

Which ETF is better, ZNOV or EAPR?

On 1-year performance, EAPR leads with 22.51% vs 7.58% for ZNOV. On fees, ZNOV is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ZNOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZNOV or EAPR?

Over the 1-year period, EAPR has performed better with a 22.51% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZNOV or EAPR?

ZNOV is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZNOV or EAPR?

ZNOV and EAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ZNOV and EAPR?

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZNOV and 0.89% for EAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.