PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMUN vs. TBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZMUN vs. TBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZMUN having a 1.88% return and TBIL slightly higher at 1.91%.


ZMUN

1D
0.05%
1M
0.20%
6M
1.76%
YTD
1.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TBIL

1D
0.04%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.81%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMUN vs. TBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZMUN and TBIL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZMUN vs. TBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TBIL
TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMUN vs. TBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZMUNTBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

20.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

197.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,059.54

ZMUN vs. TBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZMUN vs. TBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, which is greater than TBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMUN and TBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMUNTBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-0.10%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-0.00%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

ZMUN vs. TBIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZMUNTBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

0.28%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.54%

0.32%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.54%

0.32%

+0.22%

ZMUN vs. TBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMUN has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TBIL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZMUN vs. TBIL - Dividend Comparison

ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than TBIL's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TBIL
F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
3.73%4.07%5.02%5.00%1.10%
ZMUN
F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF
2.60%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZMUN and TBIL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.

TBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 2.60% for ZMUN.

ZMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TBIL is Ultrashort Bond. ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index, while TBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZMUN and 0.15% for TBIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMUN and TBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer