ZMUN vs. HMOP
ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) and HMOP (Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. ZMUN is passively managed, while HMOP is actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMUN charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HMOP.
Performance
ZMUN vs. HMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMUN achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than HMOP's 1.32% return.
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMOP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN vs. HMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.80% | 0.67% |
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 1.32% | 1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMUN and HMOP is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMUN vs. HMOP — Risk / Return Rank
ZMUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HMOP
ZMUN vs. HMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZMUN | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZMUN vs. HMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum HMOP drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMUN and HMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMUN | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -13.12% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.99% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -2.46% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
ZMUN vs. HMOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMUN | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54% | 2.65% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 3.86% | -3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 4.25% | -3.71% |
ZMUN vs. HMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMUN has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HMOP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZMUN vs. HMOP - Dividend Comparison
ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than HMOP's 3.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 3.46% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 2.92% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 5.26% | 2.87% | 2.27% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMUN and HMOP have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMOP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMOP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
HMOP has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZMUN and 0.29% for HMOP.
Find the right allocation for ZMUN and HMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer