ZMT.TO vs. COPP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZMT.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)) and COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZMT.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Index Canadian Dollar Hedged, while COPP is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ZMT.TO returned 109.69% vs 114.21% for COPP. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZMT.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPP.

Performance

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ZMT.TO is traded in CAD, while COPP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMT.TO achieves a 39.44% return, which is significantly higher than COPP's 28.30% return.

ZMT.TO

• 1D: -3.52%
• 1M: 16.19%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 6M: 46.49%
• 1Y: 109.69%
• 3Y*: 42.46%
• 5Y*: 20.69%
• 10Y*: 17.71%

COPP

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: 25.43%
• YTD: 28.30%
• 6M: 38.97%
• 1Y: 114.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZMT.TO BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)	39.44%	63.17%	16.63%
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	28.30%	66.03%	10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMT.TO and COPP is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.62

The correlation between ZMT.TO and COPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZMT.TO	COPP
Basic Materials	89.9%	92.0%
Industrials	10.1%	0.1%
Energy	3.7%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Financial Services	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Technology	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

ZMT.TO vs. COPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMT.TO

ZMT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ZMT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ZMT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ZMT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ZMT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

COPP

COPP Risk / Return Rank: 70
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZMT.TO	COPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.77	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.13	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.40	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.63	4.01	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.58	14.20	+0.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the COPP Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMT.TO and COPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZMT.TO	COPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	2.77	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.21	-1.21

Drawdowns

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMT.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.73%, which is greater than COPP's maximum drawdown of -41.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMT.TO and COPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMT.TO	COPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.73%	-41.76%	-38.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.81%	-28.67%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-3.11%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.15%	-12.99%	-30.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.55%	8.07%	-0.52%

Volatility

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Volatility Comparison

BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) have volatilities of 14.55% and 15.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZMT.TO	COPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.55%	15.19%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.86%	35.29%	-3.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.81%	41.51%	-2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.74%	39.01%	-5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.32%	39.01%	-5.69%

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMT.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than COPP's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZMT.TO vs. COPP - Dividend Comparison

ZMT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than COPP's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	1.87%	2.37%	2.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZMT.TO BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)	0.15%	0.21%	0.34%	0.87%	1.46%	2.82%	1.03%	2.34%	3.95%	1.29%	1.24%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMT.TO and COPP in my portfolio?

ZMT.TO and COPP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZMT.TO or COPP?

On fees, ZMT.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZMT.TO or COPP?

ZMT.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPP.

What is the main difference between ZMT.TO and COPP?

ZMT.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while COPP is Commodity Producers Equities. ZMT.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Index Canadian Dollar Hedged, while COPP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZMT.TO and 0.65% for COPP.