COPP vs. SLVP
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP).
COPP and SLVP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COPP is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 4, 2024. SLVP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both COPP and SLVP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COPP or SLVP.
Correlation
The correlation between COPP and SLVP is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
COPP vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
COPP:
33.92%
SLVP:
38.73%
COPP:
-27.37%
SLVP:
-80.47%
COPP:
-26.05%
SLVP:
-46.12%
Returns By Period
COPP
N/A
-9.50%
-14.11%
N/A
N/A
N/A
SLVP
16.85%
-10.05%
0.56%
14.05%
3.51%
4.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COPP vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COPP vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
COPP vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than SLVP's 1.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 1.03% | 0.87% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 2.39% | 2.02% | 1.27% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.71% | 2.03% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
COPP vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPP drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP and SLVP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COPP vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) is 7.32%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that COPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.