COPP vs. SLVP
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP).
COPP and SLVP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COPP is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 4, 2024. SLVP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both COPP and SLVP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COPP vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COPP vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 2.61% | 74.02% | 4.18% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 3.47% | 202.84% | 30.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPP achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 3.47% return.
COPP
- 1D
- 9.20%
- 1M
- -18.73%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 29.46%
- 1Y
- 86.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -25.36%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 31.80%
- 1Y
- 141.24%
- 3Y*
- 47.57%
- 5Y*
- 19.59%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COPP vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COPP vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
COPP
SLVP
COPP vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPP | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 2.64 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 2.75 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 4.21 | -1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 14.23 | -3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPP | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.64 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.09 | +0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between COPP and SLVP is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
COPP vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than SLVP's 1.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 2.31% | 2.37% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
COPP vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPP drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP and SLVP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPP | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.37% | -80.47% | +36.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.91% | -33.57% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.51% | -25.36% | +5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.33% | -47.13% | +32.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.45% | 9.93% | -2.48% |
Volatility
COPP vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) have volatilities of 19.84% and 19.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COPP | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.84% | 19.67% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.18% | 44.96% | -10.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.97% | 53.91% | -8.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.03% | 42.41% | -2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.03% | 42.44% | -2.41% |