ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO
ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) and XCNS.TO (iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - ZMMK.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by BMO, while XCNS.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZMMK.TO returned 3.84%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for XCNS.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMMK.TO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XCNS.TO.
Performance
ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than XCNS.TO's 5.63% return.
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCNS.TO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 13.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 1.03% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
XCNS.TO iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 5.63% | 10.46% | 11.73% | 10.67% | -11.25% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMMK.TO and XCNS.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2021 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMMK.TO
XCNS.TO
ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZMMK.TO | XCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.22 | 1.39 | +3.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 62.17 | 2.80 | +59.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 348.17 | 11.14 | +337.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum XCNS.TO drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and XCNS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMMK.TO | XCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -17.46% | +17.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -4.86% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.08% | -6.40% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.71% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -3.49% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 1.22% | -1.21% |
Volatility
ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.08%, while iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMMK.TO | XCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 3.47% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 5.85% | -5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 6.84% | -6.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 6.92% | -6.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 7.79% | -7.45% |
ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XCNS.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZMMK.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than XCNS.TO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCNS.TO iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 2.49% | 2.54% | 2.58% | 2.49% | 2.26% | 1.81% | 2.15% | 0.92% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.53% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMMK.TO and XCNS.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZMMK.TO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZMMK.TO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XCNS.TO.
ZMMK.TO is categorized as Money Market, while XCNS.TO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ZMMK.TO and 0.20% for XCNS.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZMMK.TO and XCNS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer