XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) and iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO).
XCNS.TO and XTR.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCNS.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019. XTR.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Neut Tgt Alloc NR CAD. It was launched on Dec 19, 2005.
Performance
XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCNS.TO iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 0.28% | 9.44% | 11.73% | 10.66% | -11.25% | 5.93% | 10.28% | 3.45% |
XTR.TO iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF | 2.91% | 5.04% | 12.59% | 4.85% | -4.61% | 10.02% | 2.26% | 4.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCNS.TO achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than XTR.TO's 2.91% return.
XCNS.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 8.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- —
XTR.TO
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCNS.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XTR.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XCNS.TO
XTR.TO
XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) and iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCNS.TO | XTR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.61 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 0.79 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.86 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 2.88 | +2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCNS.TO | XTR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.61 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.81 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.37 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCNS.TO and XTR.TO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO - Dividend Comparison
XCNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than XTR.TO's 4.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCNS.TO iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 2.63% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.49% | 2.26% | 1.81% | 2.15% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTR.TO iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF | 4.03% | 4.10% | 4.14% | 4.46% | 4.47% | 4.08% | 5.39% | 5.21% | 5.57% | 5.08% | 5.14% | 6.59% |
Drawdowns
XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum XTR.TO drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNS.TO and XTR.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCNS.TO | XTR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -51.58% | +34.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.60% | -5.90% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.09% | -9.87% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -1.56% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -5.12% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.78% | -0.26% |
Volatility
XCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO) at 2.25%. This indicates that XCNS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCNS.TO | XTR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 2.25% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.06% | 4.72% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 7.12% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.72% | 6.38% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 8.37% | -0.80% |