ZMMK.TO vs. MART

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) and MART (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZMMK.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by BMO, while MART is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZMMK.TO returned 3.86%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for MART. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. ZMMK.TO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MART.

Performance

ZMMK.TO vs. MART - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ZMMK.TO is traded in CAD, while MART is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MART values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than MART's 9.90% return.

ZMMK.TO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 2.50%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MART

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 4.60%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 8.99%
• 1Y: 22.14%
• 3Y*: 17.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMMK.TO vs. MART - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series	0.99%	2.77%	4.94%	4.11%
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF	9.90%	9.66%	25.54%	13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMMK.TO and MART is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023	-0.00

Return for Risk

ZMMK.TO vs. MART — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMMK.TO

ZMMK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ZMMK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
ZMMK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ZMMK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
ZMMK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

MART

MART Risk / Return Rank: 87
MART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MART Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MART Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MART Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MART Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMMK.TO vs. MART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZMMK.TO	MART	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.68	2.96	+6.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	24.12	4.15	+19.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	5.48	1.61	+3.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	83.57	5.96	+77.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	380.38	21.97	+358.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZMMK.TO vs. MART - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 9.68, which is higher than the MART Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMMK.TO and MART, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZMMK.TO	MART	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.68	2.96	+6.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	10.31	1.90	+8.41

Drawdowns

ZMMK.TO vs. MART - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum MART drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and MART.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMMK.TO	MART	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-12.90%	+12.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.03%	-3.73%	+3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.08%	-12.90%	+12.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-1.21%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	1.01%	-1.00%

Volatility

ZMMK.TO vs. MART - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.06%, while Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZMMK.TO	MART	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.06%	1.32%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.18%	5.90%	-5.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26%	7.51%	-7.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.34%	9.62%	-9.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.34%	9.62%	-9.28%

ZMMK.TO vs. MART - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MART's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZMMK.TO vs. MART - Dividend Comparison

ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while MART has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series	2.53%	3.02%	4.66%	4.98%	1.95%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMMK.TO and MART in my portfolio?

ZMMK.TO and MART have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZMMK.TO or MART?

On fees, ZMMK.TO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZMMK.TO or MART?

ZMMK.TO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MART.

What is the main difference between ZMMK.TO and MART?

ZMMK.TO is categorized as Money Market, while MART is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ZMMK.TO and 0.74% for MART.