MART vs. OCTT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT).

MART and OCTT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MART is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on Feb 28, 2023. OCTT is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on Sep 30, 2020.

Performance

MART vs. OCTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MART vs. OCTT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF	-0.96%	14.93%	15.60%	16.94%
OCTT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF	-2.74%	13.86%	11.87%	17.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MART achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly higher than OCTT's -2.74% return.

MART

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 14.62%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OCTT

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: -2.74%
• 6M: -0.69%
• 1Y: 13.71%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MART vs. OCTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MART and OCTT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

MART

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF

OCTT

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF

Return for Risk

MART vs. OCTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MART

MART Risk / Return Rank: 74
MART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MART Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MART Omega Ratio Rank: 80
MART Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MART Martin Ratio Rank: 83

OCTT

OCTT Risk / Return Rank: 66
OCTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
OCTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
OCTT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
OCTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
OCTT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MART vs. OCTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MART	OCTT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.09	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	1.65	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.26	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	1.62	+0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.61	8.45	+1.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MART vs. OCTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MART Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the OCTT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MART and OCTT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MART	OCTT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.09	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.98	+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between MART and OCTT is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MART vs. OCTT - Dividend Comparison

Neither MART nor OCTT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MART vs. OCTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MART drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum OCTT drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MART and OCTT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MART	OCTT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	-13.49%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.77%	-8.70%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-3.98%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-2.08%	+1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.67%	-0.11%

Volatility

MART vs. OCTT - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MART	OCTT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	3.74%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.56%	6.30%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.18%	12.68%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.82%	10.38%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.82%	10.30%	-0.48%