ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO
ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) and CCAD.TO (CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZMMK.TO returned 2.50% vs 2.56% for CCAD.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMMK.TO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for CCAD.TO.
Performance
ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZMMK.TO having a 0.99% return and CCAD.TO slightly lower at 0.98%.
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCAD.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.99% | 1.66% |
CCAD.TO CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF | 0.98% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMMK.TO and CCAD.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMMK.TO
CCAD.TO
ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF (CCAD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZMMK.TO | CCAD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.48 | 3.64 | +1.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 83.57 | 32.24 | +51.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 380.38 | 169.88 | +210.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZMMK.TO | CCAD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.68 | 7.23 | +2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.31 | 7.33 | +2.98 |
Drawdowns
ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, which is greater than CCAD.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and CCAD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMMK.TO | CCAD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.08% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -0.08% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.02% | -0.01% |
Volatility
ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF (CCAD.TO) have volatilities of 0.06% and 0.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMMK.TO | CCAD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.18% | 0.19% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26% | 0.36% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 0.35% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 0.35% | -0.01% |
ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CCAD.TO's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZMMK.TO vs. CCAD.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than CCAD.TO's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCAD.TO CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF | 2.63% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.53% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMMK.TO and CCAD.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZMMK.TO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZMMK.TO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for CCAD.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and CIBC. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ZMMK.TO and 0.14% for CCAD.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZMMK.TO and CCAD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer