CCAD.TO vs. CSBG.NEO

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF (CCAD.TO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO).

CCAD.TO and CSBG.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCAD.TO is an actively managed fund by CIBC. It was launched on May 14, 2025. CSBG.NEO is an actively managed fund by CIBC. It was launched on Jun 18, 2021.

Performance

CCAD.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF (CCAD.TO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CCAD.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 1.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSBG.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: 0.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCAD.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCAD.TO CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF	0.59%	1.69%
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%

CCAD.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCAD.TO has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CSBG.NEO's 0.90% expense ratio.

CSBG.NEO

CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF

CCAD.TO

CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF

Return for Risk

CCAD.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF (CCAD.TO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCAD.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	7.15	1.10	+6.05

Drawdowns

CCAD.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCAD.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, which is greater than CSBG.NEO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCAD.TO and CSBG.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCAD.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	0.00%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	0.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	0.00%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCAD.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37%	0.00%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.37%	1.30%	-0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.37%	1.30%	-0.93%

Dividends

CCAD.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Dividend Comparison

CCAD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while CSBG.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCAD.TO CIBC Premium Cash Management ETF	2.23%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.16%	1.21%	1.66%