PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLI.TO achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than XEF.TO's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLI.TO has underperformed XEF.TO with an annualized return of 5.46%, while XEF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.


ZLI.TO

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.78%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
-0.04%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
5.46%

XEF.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
5.38%
YTD
9.95%
6M
10.72%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
9.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZLI.TO
BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF
0.78%12.93%11.92%9.08%-9.81%6.78%-0.89%9.70%4.88%13.87%
XEF.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
9.95%25.69%12.04%15.21%-9.53%10.36%6.13%15.86%-6.65%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ZLI.TO and XEF.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015

0.66

The correlation between ZLI.TO and XEF.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZLI.TO
XEF.TO

Financial Services

17.1%
22.9%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%
6.4%

Communication Services

13.9%
4.4%

Healthcare

12.8%
9.8%

Industrials

12.6%
20.5%

Utilities

11.8%
3.8%

Real Estate

6.5%
3.1%

Technology

5.0%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
8.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
6.6%

Energy

0.9%
4.0%

Financial Services

ZLI.TO
17.1%
XEF.TO
22.9%

Consumer Defensive

ZLI.TO
14.6%
XEF.TO
6.4%

Communication Services

ZLI.TO
13.9%
XEF.TO
4.4%

Healthcare

ZLI.TO
12.8%
XEF.TO
9.8%

Industrials

ZLI.TO
12.6%
XEF.TO
20.5%

Utilities

ZLI.TO
11.8%
XEF.TO
3.8%

Real Estate

ZLI.TO
6.5%
XEF.TO
3.1%

Technology

ZLI.TO
5.0%
XEF.TO
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ZLI.TO
2.9%
XEF.TO
8.2%

Basic Materials

ZLI.TO
1.9%
XEF.TO
6.6%

Energy

ZLI.TO
0.9%
XEF.TO
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZLI.TO
ZLI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ZLI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XEF.TO
XEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZLI.TOXEF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.31

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

2.06

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

8.22

-8.24

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLI.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLI.TO and XEF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZLI.TOXEF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

1.68

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.81

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.66

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.71

-0.22

Drawdowns

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLI.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.67%, smaller than the maximum XEF.TO drawdown of -28.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLI.TO and XEF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZLI.TOXEF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.67%

-28.51%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

-11.27%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.37%

-14.32%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-24.58%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.67%

-28.51%

+3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-1.09%

-5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-4.62%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.82%

+0.47%

Volatility

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI.TO) is 3.58%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that ZLI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZLI.TOXEF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

4.77%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

11.56%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

13.85%

-3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.78%

13.58%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.41%

14.85%

-2.44%

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZLI.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XEF.TO's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZLI.TO vs. XEF.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, which matches XEF.TO's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEF.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
2.21%2.43%2.76%2.75%2.93%2.42%1.93%2.72%2.76%2.10%2.42%2.42%
ZLI.TO
BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF
2.23%2.24%2.47%2.69%2.86%2.50%2.65%2.35%2.48%2.21%2.49%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZLI.TO and XEF.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEF.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEF.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZLI.TO.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ZLI.TO and 0.23% for XEF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZLI.TO and XEF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer