XEF.TO vs. XFH.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO).
XEF.TO and XFH.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 10, 2013. XFH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Feb 10, 2015. Both XEF.TO and XFH.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XEF.TO or XFH.TO.
Key characteristics
XEF.TO | XFH.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 13.57% | 11.06% |
1Y Return | 19.23% | 14.55% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.23% | 5.69% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.94% | 8.16% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.81 | 1.30 |
Daily Std Dev | 10.41% | 10.92% |
Max Drawdown | -28.50% | -33.85% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -3.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEF.TO and XFH.TO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XEF.TO vs. XFH.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XEF.TO achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than XFH.TO's 11.06% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XEF.TO vs. XFH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XEF.TO and XFH.TO have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XEF.TO vs. XFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XEF.TO vs. XFH.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than XFH.TO's 2.85% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.42% | 1.93% | 2.72% | 2.76% | 2.10% | 2.42% | 2.42% | 5.21% | 1.72% |
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.85% | 2.93% | 2.93% | 2.31% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 2.68% | 2.13% | 2.04% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XEF.TO vs. XFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, smaller than the maximum XFH.TO drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEF.TO and XFH.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XEF.TO vs. XFH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) is 4.11%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that XEF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XFH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.