Correlation
The correlation between XEF.TO and XEF-U.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
XEF.TO vs. XEF-U.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO).
XEF.TO and XEF-U.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 10, 2013. XEF-U.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2019. Both XEF.TO and XEF-U.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XEF.TO or XEF-U.TO.
Performance
XEF.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
XEF.TO:
0.85
XEF-U.TO:
0.89
XEF.TO:
1.23
XEF-U.TO:
1.67
XEF.TO:
1.17
XEF-U.TO:
1.23
XEF.TO:
0.90
XEF-U.TO:
1.54
XEF.TO:
4.16
XEF-U.TO:
4.66
XEF.TO:
3.11%
XEF-U.TO:
4.47%
XEF.TO:
15.51%
XEF-U.TO:
18.41%
XEF.TO:
-28.51%
XEF-U.TO:
-33.72%
XEF.TO:
-1.78%
XEF-U.TO:
-0.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEF.TO achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly lower than XEF-U.TO's 16.33% return.
XEF.TO
10.92%
4.30%
12.75%
12.78%
13.77%
11.40%
6.74%
XEF-U.TO
16.33%
5.42%
15.29%
12.11%
11.84%
11.90%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XEF.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEF.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XEF-U.TO's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XEF.TO vs. XEF-U.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XEF.TO
XEF-U.TO
XEF.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
XEF.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than XEF-U.TO's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEF.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 2.48% | 2.76% | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.42% | 1.93% | 2.72% | 2.76% | 2.10% | 2.42% | 2.42% | 5.21% |
XEF-U.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 1.75% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 2.43% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XEF.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum XEF-U.TO drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEF.TO and XEF-U.TO.
Loading data...
Volatility
XEF.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) is 2.93%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that XEF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEF-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...