ZJAN vs. UXJL
ZJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
ZJAN vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZJAN achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
ZJAN
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZJAN vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January | 2.27% | 3.48% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZJAN and UXJL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZJAN vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
ZJAN
UXJL
ZJAN vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZJAN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZJAN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.18 | 1.87 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
ZJAN vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZJAN drawdown since its inception was -3.20%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJAN and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZJAN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -10.29% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.76% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -1.51% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | — | — |
Volatility
ZJAN vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZJAN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04% | 13.90% | -11.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 13.90% | -10.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 13.90% | -10.93% |
ZJAN vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZJAN vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZJAN nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZJAN and UXJL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
ZJAN and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZJAN and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for ZJAN and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer