ZJAN vs. XBJA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ZJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January) and XBJA (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZJAN returned 7.73% vs 14.87% for XBJA. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

ZJAN vs. XBJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZJAN achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than XBJA's 5.55% return.

ZJAN

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.98%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XBJA

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 5.55%
• 6M: 6.13%
• 1Y: 14.87%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZJAN vs. XBJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January	2.32%	6.79%
XBJA Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January	5.55%	11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ZJAN and XBJA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.84

The correlation between ZJAN and XBJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZJAN vs. XBJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZJAN

ZJAN Risk / Return Rank: 95
ZJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ZJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

XBJA

XBJA Risk / Return Rank: 77
XBJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
XBJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
XBJA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
XBJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XBJA Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJAN vs. XBJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZJAN	XBJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.82	2.54	+1.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.88	3.73	+2.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.86	1.59	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.81	2.83	+2.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	30.32	16.57	+13.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZJAN vs. XBJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZJAN Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the XBJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZJAN and XBJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZJAN	XBJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82	2.54	+1.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.20	0.63	+1.57

Drawdowns

ZJAN vs. XBJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJAN drawdown since its inception was -3.20%, smaller than the maximum XBJA drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJAN and XBJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZJAN	XBJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-17.42%	+14.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.36%	-5.33%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-3.15%	+2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	0.91%	-0.65%

Volatility

ZJAN vs. XBJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) is 0.40%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) has a volatility of 0.78%. This indicates that ZJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZJAN	XBJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.40%	0.78%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.44%	5.12%	-3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04%	5.89%	-3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.98%	11.60%	-8.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.98%	11.60%	-8.62%

ZJAN vs. XBJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZJAN and XBJA have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

ZJAN vs. XBJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZJAN nor XBJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZJAN and XBJA in my portfolio?

ZJAN and XBJA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZJAN or XBJA?

XBJA has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to ZJAN (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZJAN dropped -3.20% vs XBJA's -17.42%.

Which ETF is better, ZJAN or XBJA?

On 1-year performance, XBJA leads with 14.87% vs 7.73% for ZJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ZJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZJAN or XBJA?

Over the 1-year period, XBJA has performed better with a 14.87% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZJAN or XBJA?

ZJAN and XBJA have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZJAN or XBJA?

ZJAN and XBJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.