PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZJAN vs. ZDEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZJAN vs. ZDEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZJAN achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than ZDEK's 2.60% return.


ZJAN

1D
0.05%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.98%
1Y
7.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZDEK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.60%
6M
2.94%
1Y
9.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZJAN vs. ZDEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZJAN and ZDEK is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.86

The correlation between ZJAN and ZDEK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZJAN vs. ZDEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZJAN
ZJAN Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ZJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ZDEK
ZDEK Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ZDEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDEK Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJAN vs. ZDEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZJANZDEKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.82

3.37

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.88

5.26

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.73

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.81

6.23

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.32

31.93

-1.61

ZJAN vs. ZDEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZJAN Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is comparable to the ZDEK Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZJAN and ZDEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZJANZDEKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82

3.37

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.20

2.03

+0.16

Drawdowns

ZJAN vs. ZDEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJAN drawdown since its inception was -3.20%, smaller than the maximum ZDEK drawdown of -3.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJAN and ZDEK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZJANZDEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-3.40%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.36%

-1.51%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-0.45%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.29%

-0.03%

Volatility

ZJAN vs. ZDEK - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) at 0.35%. This indicates that ZJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZJANZDEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

0.35%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.44%

1.64%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04%

2.77%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.98%

3.32%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.98%

3.32%

-0.34%

ZJAN vs. ZDEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZJAN and ZDEK have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

ZJAN vs. ZDEK - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZJAN nor ZDEK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZJAN and ZDEK have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZJAN has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to ZDEK (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZJAN dropped -3.20% vs ZDEK's -3.40%.

On 1-year performance, ZDEK leads with 9.29% vs 7.73% for ZJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZDEK has performed better with a 9.29% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZJAN and ZDEK have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

ZJAN and ZDEK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZJAN and ZDEK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer