PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZIVO vs. TRGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZIVO vs. TRGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. (ZIVO) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIVO achieves a -54.02% return, which is significantly lower than TRGP's 48.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZIVO having a 28.41% annualized return and TRGP not far behind at 27.05%.


ZIVO

1D
0.00%
1M
-23.81%
6M
-61.90%
YTD
-54.02%
1Y
-59.88%
3Y*
-30.66%
5Y*
-28.23%
10Y*
28.41%
ALL TIME*
11.11%

TRGP

1D
1.23%
1M
4.93%
6M
35.83%
YTD
48.71%
1Y
69.52%
3Y*
52.33%
5Y*
48.14%
10Y*
27.05%
ALL TIME*
21.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$312.36M$311.65M$326.93M
$4.68K$3.81K$4.67K

ZIVO vs. TRGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZIVO
ZIVO Bioscience, Inc.
-54.02%-59.53%1,691.67%-92.00%-12.89%1,813.33%-11.76%30.77%44.44%-5.26%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
48.71%5.65%110.12%21.01%43.71%100.15%-32.48%23.98%-19.88%-7.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIVO and TRGP is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2012

0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZIVO:

$15.55M

TRGP:

$58.03B

EPS

ZIVO:

-$1.70

TRGP:

$14.79

PS Ratio

ZIVO:

131.10

TRGP:

2.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZIVO:

$119.03K

TRGP:

$16.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZIVO:

$39.21K

TRGP:

$3.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZIVO:

-$6.59M

TRGP:

$4.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZIVO vs. TRGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZIVO
ZIVO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ZIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TRGP
TRGP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TRGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRGP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TRGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRGP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZIVO vs. TRGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. (ZIVO) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZIVOTRGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.37

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

4.14

-4.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

14.81

-15.90

ZIVO vs. TRGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIVO Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the TRGP Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIVO and TRGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZIVO vs. TRGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIVO drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, roughly equal to the maximum TRGP drawdown of -95.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVO and TRGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZIVOTRGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.52%

-95.21%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.85%

-16.01%

-77.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.18%

-31.61%

-64.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.52%

-31.61%

-66.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.52%

-90.78%

-7.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.77%

-4.88%

-82.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.98%

-33.30%

-30.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.67%

4.47%

+53.20%

Volatility

ZIVO vs. TRGP - Volatility Comparison

ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. (ZIVO) has a higher volatility of 46.24% compared to Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) at 8.59%. This indicates that ZIVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZIVOTRGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.24%

8.59%

+37.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

139.92%

19.51%

+120.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.49%

27.68%

+157.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

142.36%

31.68%

+110.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,082.66%

47.50%

+1,035.16%

Dividends

ZIVO vs. TRGP - Dividend Comparison

ZIVO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
1.66%2.03%1.54%2.13%1.90%0.77%4.59%8.92%10.11%7.52%6.49%12.53%
ZIVO
ZIVO Bioscience, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZIVO vs. TRGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. and Targa Resources Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ZIVO and TRGP have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZIVO has higher volatility (46.24%) compared to TRGP (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIVO dropped -98.52% vs TRGP's -95.21%.

TRGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZIVO and TRGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer