ZIVB vs. OOQB
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.
Performance
ZIVB vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOQB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -24.56%
- 1Y
- -26.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
OOQB
ZIVB vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIVB | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.41 | — |
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum OOQB drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and OOQB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -53.44% | +53.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -43.69% | +43.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -23.32% | +23.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.24% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 51.51% | -51.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 58.03% | -58.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 58.03% | -58.03% |
ZIVB vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 11.62% | 9.53% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.
ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.75% for OOQB.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and OOQB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer