ZIVB vs. MSTZ
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
ZIVB vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- 84.18%
- YTD
- -49.10%
- 6M
- -27.85%
- 1Y
- 77.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 30.30% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
MSTZ
ZIVB vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIVB | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.53 | — |
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -99.36% | +99.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -84.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -98.21% | +98.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -94.40% | +94.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 40.54% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 37.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 125.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 140.15% | -140.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 170.19% | -170.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 170.19% | -170.19% |
ZIVB vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZIVB nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
ZIVB and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 1.05% for MSTZ.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer