ZINC vs. DGRE
ZINC (Zacks Income ETF) and DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ZINC is a Dividend fund actively managed by Zacks, while DGRE is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Their -0.27 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ZINC charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DGRE.
Performance
ZINC vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZINC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DGRE
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- YTD
- 27.72%
- 1Y
- 46.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $223.97K | $439.36K | $483.26K | |
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | $195.58K | $433.78K | $222.56K |
ZINC vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | 4.83% |
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | -3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZINC and DGRE is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZINC vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank
ZINC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRE
ZINC vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZINC | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZINC vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZINC drawdown since its inception was -2.86%, smaller than the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC and DGRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZINC | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -36.95% | +34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -5.58% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -11.93% | +11.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility
ZINC vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZINC | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 24.39% | -13.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 19.12% | -8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 20.00% | -9.22% |
ZINC vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZINC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZINC vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison
ZINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.30% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZINC and DGRE have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZINC.
DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for ZINC.
ZINC is categorized as Dividend, while DGRE is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZINC and 0.32% for DGRE.
Find the right allocation for ZINC and DGRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer