ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE
ZINC.L (WisdomTree Zinc) and 0GZB.DE (BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC) are both Metals funds - ZINC.L tracks the Bloomberg Zinc while 0GZB.DE tracks the RICI Enhanced Copper (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZINC.L returned 5.86%/yr vs 5.78%/yr for 0GZB.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZINC.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for 0GZB.DE.
Performance
ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZINC.L is traded in USD, while 0GZB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0GZB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZINC.L achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than 0GZB.DE's 9.48% return.
ZINC.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
0GZB.DE
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 22.07%
- 1Y
- 44.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- —
ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 15.82% | 6.70% | 13.11% | -9.01% | -11.08% | 26.65% | 15.73% | 4.57% |
0GZB.DE BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC | 9.48% | 50.68% | 2.19% | 7.00% | -16.45% | 10.71% | 33.47% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZINC.L and 0GZB.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ZINC.L and 0GZB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZINC.L
0GZB.DE
ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZINC.L | 0GZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.04 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | 9.48 | +3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZINC.L | 0GZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.02 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.24 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.57 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZINC.L drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, which is greater than 0GZB.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC.L and 0GZB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZINC.L | 0GZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.49% | -45.15% | -32.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -14.66% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.66% | -18.57% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.04% | -42.85% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.98% | -3.05% | -33.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.38% | -15.40% | -40.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 4.71% | -1.81% |
Volatility
ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) is 4.90%, while BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that ZINC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0GZB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZINC.L | 0GZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 7.03% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 18.37% | -4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 22.07% | -3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 24.02% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 23.76% | +0.22% |
ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZINC.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than 0GZB.DE's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZINC.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZINC.L nor 0GZB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZINC.L and 0GZB.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZINC.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZINC.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for 0GZB.DE.
ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc, while 0GZB.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ZINC.L and 1.20% for 0GZB.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZINC.L and 0GZB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer