ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L).
ZINC.L and AMPS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZINC.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Zinc. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. AMPS.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity. It was launched on Mar 3, 2022. Both ZINC.L and AMPS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 6.66% | 6.70% | 13.11% | -9.01% | -12.59% |
AMPS.L WisdomTree Battery Metals | 5.70% | 17.34% | -0.96% | -24.30% | -1.13% |
Different Trading Currencies
ZINC.L is traded in USD, while AMPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AMPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZINC.L achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than AMPS.L's 5.70% return.
ZINC.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
AMPS.L
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZINC.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AMPS.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ZINC.L
AMPS.L
ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZINC.L | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.00 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 1.38 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.02 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 4.87 | +2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZINC.L | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.00 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | -0.10 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZINC.L and AMPS.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZINC.L nor AMPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZINC.L drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, which is greater than AMPS.L's maximum drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC.L and AMPS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZINC.L | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.49% | -35.07% | -42.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -8.95% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.97% | -17.92% | -24.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.54% | -24.08% | -32.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.63% | -0.40% |
Volatility
ZINC.L vs. AMPS.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) at 4.86%. This indicates that ZINC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZINC.L | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 4.86% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 12.24% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 17.37% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.35% | 21.84% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 21.84% | +2.25% |