ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L).
ZINC.L and XRH0.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZINC.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Zinc. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. XRH0.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Rhodium. It was launched on May 19, 2011. Both ZINC.L and XRH0.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 6.66% | 6.70% | 13.11% | -9.01% | -11.08% | 26.65% | 15.73% | -0.07% | -22.41% | 27.77% |
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -18.78% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 132.83% | 46.39% | 100.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZINC.L achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than XRH0.L's -18.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ZINC.L has underperformed XRH0.L with an annualized return of 7.40%, while XRH0.L has yielded a comparatively higher 29.16% annualized return.
ZINC.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -27.34%
- YTD
- -18.78%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 56.04%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- -17.48%
- 10Y*
- 29.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZINC.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than XRH0.L's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L — Risk / Return Rank
ZINC.L
XRH0.L
ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZINC.L | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.75 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 1.54 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 1.69 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 4.04 | +3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZINC.L | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.75 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | -0.27 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.45 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.19 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZINC.L and XRH0.L is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZINC.L nor XRH0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZINC.L drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, smaller than the maximum XRH0.L drawdown of -85.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC.L and XRH0.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZINC.L | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.49% | -85.90% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -34.33% | +23.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.04% | -85.90% | +38.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.04% | -85.90% | +38.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.97% | -63.32% | +21.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.54% | -51.19% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 14.34% | -11.11% |
Volatility
ZINC.L vs. XRH0.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) is 6.61%, while Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a volatility of 18.85%. This indicates that ZINC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRH0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZINC.L | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 18.85% | -12.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 61.89% | -47.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 74.45% | -55.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.35% | 64.40% | -39.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 64.13% | -40.04% |