ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO
ZHY.TO (BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and ZPAY.TO (BMO Premium Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZHY.TO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Very Liquid Index CAD Hedged, while ZPAY.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BMO. ZHY.TO is passively managed, while ZPAY.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZHY.TO returned 2.53%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for ZPAY.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZHY.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for ZPAY.TO.
Performance
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZHY.TO achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than ZPAY.TO's 5.71% return.
ZHY.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
ZPAY.TO
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 0.71% | 6.27% | 6.04% | 11.48% | -12.80% | 4.03% | 3.23% |
ZPAY.TO BMO Premium Yield ETF | 5.71% | 2.61% | 16.94% | 16.87% | -6.33% | 9.54% | 526.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZHY.TO and ZPAY.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020 | 0.30 |
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZHY.TO
ZPAY.TO
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
ZHY.TO
ZPAY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZHY.TO
ZPAY.TO
Energy
ZHY.TO
ZPAY.TO
-
Basic Materials
ZHY.TO
-
ZPAY.TO
Communication Services
ZHY.TO
-
ZPAY.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZHY.TO
-
ZPAY.TO
Financial Services
ZHY.TO
-
ZPAY.TO
Healthcare
ZHY.TO
-
ZPAY.TO
Real Estate
ZHY.TO
-
ZPAY.TO
-
Technology
ZHY.TO
-
ZPAY.TO
Utilities
ZHY.TO
-
ZPAY.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZHY.TO
ZPAY.TO
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) and BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZHY.TO | ZPAY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.50 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 3.91 | +2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZHY.TO | ZPAY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.38 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.84 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.22 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, which is greater than ZPAY.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHY.TO and ZPAY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZHY.TO | ZPAY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.44% | -14.89% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -7.64% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.70% | -12.47% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -14.76% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.83% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -2.66% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 2.92% | -2.13% |
Volatility
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) is 1.96%, while BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that ZHY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPAY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZHY.TO | ZPAY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 2.83% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 6.76% | -2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.50% | 8.27% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.51% | 10.53% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.92% | 195.95% | -185.03% |
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZHY.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPAY.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZHY.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, less than ZPAY.TO's 7.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 6.38% | 6.10% | 6.13% | 6.43% | 6.71% | 5.49% | 6.09% | 6.50% | 6.25% | 6.10% | 5.84% | 7.12% |
ZPAY.TO BMO Premium Yield ETF | 7.33% | 7.46% | 5.81% | 6.40% | 7.00% | 6.10% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZHY.TO and ZPAY.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZHY.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZHY.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for ZPAY.TO.
ZHY.TO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ZPAY.TO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZHY.TO and 0.73% for ZPAY.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZHY.TO and ZPAY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer