ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO).
ZPAY.TO and PFMN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZPAY.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Jan 15, 2020.
Performance
ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPAY.TO BMO Premium Yield ETF | -1.58% | 2.61% | 16.94% | 16.87% | -6.33% | 9.54% | 116.48% |
PFMN.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund | -0.43% | 4.86% | 15.06% | 3.13% | 5.43% | 6.10% | 16.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPAY.TO achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than PFMN.TO's -0.43% return.
ZPAY.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
PFMN.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZPAY.TO
PFMN.TO
ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPAY.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | 0.92 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.33 | 1.40 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.18 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 1.62 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | 4.57 | -4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPAY.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 0.92 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.80 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.77 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPAY.TO and PFMN.TO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZPAY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than PFMN.TO's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPAY.TO BMO Premium Yield ETF | 7.81% | 7.46% | 5.81% | 6.40% | 7.00% | 6.10% | 5.42% | 0.00% |
PFMN.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPAY.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.89%, which is greater than PFMN.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPAY.TO and PFMN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPAY.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -13.04% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -3.49% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | -4.24% | -10.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.71% | -1.72% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -1.19% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 1.24% | +2.04% |
Volatility
ZPAY.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) at 1.95%. This indicates that ZPAY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFMN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZPAY.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 1.95% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 3.24% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.60% | 5.74% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 8.01% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.80% | 9.86% | +33.94% |