ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD
ZPAY.TO (BMO Premium Yield ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZPAY.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. ZPAY.TO is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZPAY.TO returned 8.59%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for SCHD. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZPAY.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZPAY.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPAY.TO achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.03% return.
ZPAY.TO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 10.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 20.03%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPAY.TO BMO Premium Yield ETF | 4.79% | 2.61% | 16.94% | 16.87% | -6.33% | 9.54% | 526.95% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.52% | -0.44% | 21.25% | 2.24% | 3.64% | 28.70% | 10.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPAY.TO and SCHD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between ZPAY.TO and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Communication Services
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Financial Services
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Healthcare
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Industrials
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Basic Materials
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
Energy
ZPAY.TO
-
SCHD
Real Estate
ZPAY.TO
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
ZPAY.TO
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
ZPAY.TO
SCHD
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPAY.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.47 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 6.61 | -5.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 19.13 | -15.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPAY.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.57 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.90 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 1.12 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPAY.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.89%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPAY.TO and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPAY.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -26.93% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -4.30% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.47% | -15.30% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | -15.30% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -1.22% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -2.86% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 1.48% | +1.44% |
Volatility
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 2.74% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPAY.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 2.63% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 8.23% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.24% | 11.10% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.53% | 12.63% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 196.01% | 15.18% | +180.83% |
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPAY.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPAY.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
ZPAY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
ZPAY.TO BMO Premium Yield ETF | 7.40% | 7.46% | 5.81% | 6.40% | 7.00% | 6.10% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPAY.TO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for ZPAY.TO.
ZPAY.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for ZPAY.TO and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for ZPAY.TO and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer