ZHDG vs. QQA
ZHDG (ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZHDG returned 18.31% vs 32.22% for QQA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZHDG charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
ZHDG vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZHDG achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.57% return.
ZHDG
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 32.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZHDG vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 5.12% | 14.34% | 4.62% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.57% | 17.24% | 7.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZHDG and QQA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ZHDG and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZHDG vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZHDG
QQA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ZHDG
QQA
Financial Services
ZHDG
QQA
Communication Services
ZHDG
QQA
Consumer Cyclical
ZHDG
QQA
Healthcare
ZHDG
QQA
Industrials
ZHDG
QQA
Consumer Defensive
ZHDG
QQA
Energy
ZHDG
QQA
Utilities
ZHDG
QQA
Real Estate
ZHDG
QQA
Basic Materials
ZHDG
QQA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZHDG vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
ZHDG
QQA
ZHDG vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZHDG | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.70 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 16.59 | -7.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZHDG | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.57 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.18 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
ZHDG vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, which is greater than QQA's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZHDG | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.27% | -19.73% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | -8.76% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.10% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -2.44% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.95% | +0.10% |
Volatility
ZHDG vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZHDG | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 2.91% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | 9.68% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 12.59% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 18.27% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 18.27% | -6.52% |
ZHDG vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZHDG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZHDG vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than QQA's 9.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.78% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.59% | 1.52% | 3.58% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZHDG and QQA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to ZHDG (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZHDG dropped -23.27% vs QQA's -19.73%.
On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 18.31% for ZHDG. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ZHDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 18.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ZHDG.
QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.
They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ZHDG and 0.29% for QQA.
QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZHDG and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer