ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZGRO.TO (BMO Growth ETF) and ZEQT.TO (BMO All-Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZGRO.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while ZEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZGRO.TO returned 18.49%/yr vs 22.90%/yr for ZEQT.TO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZGRO.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ZEQT.TO.

Performance

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGRO.TO achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than ZEQT.TO's 13.04% return.

ZGRO.TO

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 6M: 10.31%
• 1Y: 25.76%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: —

ZEQT.TO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 6.38%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 12.85%
• 1Y: 31.85%
• 3Y*: 22.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ZGRO.TO BMO Growth ETF	10.53%	16.39%	20.71%	14.64%	-5.54%
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF	13.04%	19.67%	25.44%	16.79%	-5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGRO.TO and ZEQT.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022	0.83

The correlation between ZGRO.TO and ZEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZGRO.TO	ZEQT.TO
Technology	22.2%	22.4%
Financial Services	19.8%	19.8%
Industrials	11.2%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	8.3%
Energy	8.0%	7.4%
Basic Materials	7.2%	7.4%
Healthcare	6.9%	6.9%
Communication Services	6.7%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.7%
Utilities	3.0%	2.9%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.0%

Return for Risk

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGRO.TO

ZGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
ZGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ZGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ZGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ZGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ZGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

ZEQT.TO

ZEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ZEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ZEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ZEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ZEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZGRO.TO	ZEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.51	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	3.49	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.46	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	3.67	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.21	15.48	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGRO.TO and ZEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZGRO.TO	ZEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.51	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.19	-0.28

Drawdowns

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.64%, which is greater than ZEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGRO.TO and ZEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGRO.TO	ZEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.64%	-16.87%	-7.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.87%	-8.72%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.45%	-15.34%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-1.16%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.38%	-3.01%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	2.06%	-0.36%

Volatility

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) is 4.11%, while BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that ZGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGRO.TO	ZEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	5.22%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	10.46%	-1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	12.75%	-1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.76%	13.85%	-3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.99%	13.85%	-0.86%

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGRO.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZGRO.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than ZEQT.TO's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF	1.28%	1.45%	1.69%	2.13%	2.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZGRO.TO BMO Growth ETF	1.48%	1.70%	1.92%	2.27%	2.54%	2.22%	2.49%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZGRO.TO and ZEQT.TO in my portfolio?

ZGRO.TO and ZEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZGRO.TO or ZEQT.TO?

On fees, ZGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZGRO.TO or ZEQT.TO?

ZGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ZEQT.TO.

What is the main difference between ZGRO.TO and ZEQT.TO?

ZGRO.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ZEQT.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ZGRO.TO and 0.20% for ZEQT.TO.