ZGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO).
ZGRO.TO and XGRO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Feb 11, 2019. XGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 21, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZGRO.TO or XGRO.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between ZGRO.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ZGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ZGRO.TO:
2.59
XGRO.TO:
2.36
ZGRO.TO:
3.75
XGRO.TO:
3.32
ZGRO.TO:
1.50
XGRO.TO:
1.44
ZGRO.TO:
4.24
XGRO.TO:
3.88
ZGRO.TO:
17.83
XGRO.TO:
15.99
ZGRO.TO:
1.16%
XGRO.TO:
1.24%
ZGRO.TO:
7.95%
XGRO.TO:
8.39%
ZGRO.TO:
-24.64%
XGRO.TO:
-47.94%
ZGRO.TO:
-0.80%
XGRO.TO:
-0.82%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGRO.TO achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 3.23% return.
ZGRO.TO
2.94%
0.85%
9.69%
20.80%
9.43%
N/A
XGRO.TO
3.23%
0.93%
9.35%
20.02%
9.24%
7.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGRO.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ZGRO.TO
XGRO.TO
ZGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than XGRO.TO's 1.95% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGRO.TO BMO Growth ETF | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.27% | 2.54% | 2.22% | 2.49% | 2.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.95% | 2.01% | 2.25% | 1.88% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 2.24% | 7.52% | 2.07% | 2.68% | 2.18% | 5.68% |
Drawdowns
ZGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.64%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGRO.TO and XGRO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) is 2.22%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that ZGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.