PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF
1.00%27.09%
TEQT.TO
TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio
0.54%27.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEQT.TO achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than TEQT.TO's 0.54% return.


ZEQT.TO

1D
0.59%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
1.00%
6M
2.22%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
10Y*

TEQT.TO

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
0.54%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQT.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEQT.TO
ZEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TEQT.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZEQT.TOTEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.62

ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEQT.TOTEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

2.35

-1.34

Correlation

The correlation between ZEQT.TO and TEQT.TO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than TEQT.TO's 1.46% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF
1.44%1.45%1.69%2.13%2.43%
TEQT.TO
TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio
1.46%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, which is greater than TEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQT.TO and TEQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEQT.TOTEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-7.62%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-3.96%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-1.06%

-2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

Volatility

ZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZEQT.TOTEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

12.42%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

12.42%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.78%

12.42%

+1.36%