ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZGRO.TO (BMO Growth ETF) and QQCE.TO (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZGRO.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while QQCE.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 ESG Index. ZGRO.TO is actively managed, while QQCE.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZGRO.TO returned 18.49%/yr vs 30.82%/yr for QQCE.TO. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZGRO.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for QQCE.TO.

Performance

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGRO.TO achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than QQCE.TO's 23.30% return.

ZGRO.TO

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 6M: 10.31%
• 1Y: 25.76%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: —

QQCE.TO

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 14.10%
• YTD: 23.30%
• 6M: 19.99%
• 1Y: 45.87%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZGRO.TO BMO Growth ETF	10.53%	16.39%	20.71%	14.64%	-10.58%	2.86%
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	23.30%	16.43%	36.67%	44.13%	-25.37%	5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGRO.TO and QQCE.TO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021	0.50

The correlation between ZGRO.TO and QQCE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGRO.TO

ZGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
ZGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ZGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ZGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ZGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ZGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

QQCE.TO

QQCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QQCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZGRO.TO	QQCE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.80	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	3.60	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.50	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	3.50	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.21	10.72	+4.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGRO.TO and QQCE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZGRO.TO	QQCE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.80	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.92	-0.01

Drawdowns

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.64%, smaller than the maximum QQCE.TO drawdown of -30.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGRO.TO and QQCE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGRO.TO	QQCE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.64%	-30.86%	+6.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.87%	-13.16%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.45%	-23.05%	+10.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	0.00%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.38%	-8.70%	+5.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	4.29%	-2.59%

Volatility

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) is 4.11%, while Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that ZGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGRO.TO	QQCE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	4.78%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	12.65%	-3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	16.47%	-5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.76%	20.71%	-9.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.99%	20.71%	-7.72%

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGRO.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCE.TO's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZGRO.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than QQCE.TO's 0.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	0.26%	0.32%	0.38%	0.44%	0.79%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%
ZGRO.TO BMO Growth ETF	1.48%	1.70%	1.92%	2.27%	2.54%	2.22%	2.49%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZGRO.TO and QQCE.TO in my portfolio?

ZGRO.TO and QQCE.TO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZGRO.TO or QQCE.TO?

On fees, ZGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZGRO.TO or QQCE.TO?

ZGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for QQCE.TO.

What is the main difference between ZGRO.TO and QQCE.TO?

ZGRO.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQCE.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ZGRO.TO and 0.21% for QQCE.TO.