PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQCE.TO
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
-5.29%16.43%21.35%
FCMO.NEO
Fidelity US Momentum ETF
0.94%14.07%26.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCE.TO achieves a -5.29% return, which is significantly lower than FCMO.NEO's 0.94% return.


QQCE.TO

1D
3.45%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
-5.29%
6M
-4.78%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
10Y*

FCMO.NEO

1D
1.46%
1M
-4.10%
YTD
0.94%
6M
-0.31%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCE.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FCMO.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCE.TO
QQCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FCMO.NEO
FCMO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQCE.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.81

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.45

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

5.08

-0.60

QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCE.TO and FCMO.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQCE.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.81

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.01

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between QQCE.TO and FCMO.NEO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Dividend Comparison

QQCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FCMO.NEO's 0.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QQCE.TO
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
0.34%0.32%0.38%0.44%0.79%0.14%
FCMO.NEO
Fidelity US Momentum ETF
0.36%0.36%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, which is greater than FCMO.NEO's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCE.TO and FCMO.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQCE.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.86%

-21.77%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-13.90%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.17%

-5.35%

-4.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-3.12%

-5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

3.97%

+0.71%

Volatility

QQCE.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) is 6.66%, while Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that QQCE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQCE.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

8.84%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

14.74%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.51%

24.21%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

20.68%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

20.68%

+0.14%