PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZGN vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZGN vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGN achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 16.94% return.


ZGN

1D
-2.08%
1M
-9.65%
6M
24.47%
YTD
29.57%
1Y
49.73%
3Y*
-2.18%
5Y*
10Y*

AAPL

1D
0.63%
1M
8.99%
6M
22.15%
YTD
16.94%
1Y
50.87%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
16.89%
10Y*
30.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGN vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZGN
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.
29.57%26.03%-27.86%11.48%0.72%1.75%
AAPL
Apple Inc
16.94%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGN and AAPL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021

0.28

The correlation between ZGN and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZGN:

$3.53B

AAPL:

$4.66T

EPS

ZGN:

€0.66

AAPL:

$8.25

PE Ratio

ZGN:

17.56

AAPL:

38.47

PEG Ratio

ZGN:

0.28

AAPL:

5.06

PS Ratio

ZGN:

0.80

AAPL:

10.45

PB Ratio

ZGN:

2.99

AAPL:

44.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZGN:

€3.86B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZGN:

€2.47B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZGN:

€586.03M

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZGN vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGN
ZGN Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGN Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGN vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZGNAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.70

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

8.82

-3.04

ZGN vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGN and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZGN vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGN drawdown since its inception was -61.02%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGN and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZGNAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.02%

-81.80%

+20.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.88%

-13.80%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.02%

-33.36%

-27.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.92%

0.00%

-14.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.21%

-29.55%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.62%

5.78%

+2.84%

Volatility

ZGN vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) is 9.38%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that ZGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZGNAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

9.95%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.57%

18.77%

+14.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.01%

24.11%

+18.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.78%

27.78%

+13.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.78%

29.05%

+11.73%

Dividends

ZGN vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

ZGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than AAPL's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.33%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
ZGN
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.
0.91%1.38%1.45%0.94%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZGN vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
981.93M
111.18B
(ZGN) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ZGN values in EUR, AAPL values in USD

ZGN vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
56.0%
49.3%
Portfolio components
ZGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. reported a gross profit of 550.02M and revenue of 981.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

ZGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. reported an operating income of 93.59M and revenue of 981.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

ZGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. reported a net income of 55.09M and revenue of 981.93M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZGN and AAPL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to ZGN (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZGN dropped -61.02% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZGN and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer