ZGN vs. TPR
ZGN (Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.) and TPR (Tapestry, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — ZGN in Apparel Manufacturing, TPR in Luxury Goods. Over the past 3 years, ZGN returned 8.35%/yr vs 52.63%/yr for TPR. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZGN vs. TPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGN achieves a 43.71% return, which is significantly higher than TPR's 9.56% return.
ZGN
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 24.51%
- YTD
- 43.71%
- 6M
- 35.14%
- 1Y
- 76.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 25.51%
- 1Y
- 79.96%
- 3Y*
- 52.63%
- 5Y*
- 29.96%
- 10Y*
- 16.68%
ZGN vs. TPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGN Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. | 43.71% | 26.03% | -27.86% | 11.48% | 0.72% | -2.42% |
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 9.56% | 98.73% | 82.80% | 0.16% | -3.32% | 3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGN and TPR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2021 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
ZGN:
$3.92B
TPR:
$29.08B
ZGN:
$0.67
TPR:
$3.15
ZGN:
21.93
TPR:
44.31
ZGN:
1.00
TPR:
3.74
ZGN:
3.81
TPR:
42.62
ZGN:
$3.86B
TPR:
$7.85B
ZGN:
$2.47B
TPR:
$5.98B
ZGN:
$586.03M
TPR:
$1.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZGN vs. TPR — Risk / Return Rank
ZGN
TPR
ZGN vs. TPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGN | TPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 4.19 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 10.79 | -1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGN | TPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.97 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
ZGN vs. TPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGN drawdown since its inception was -61.02%, smaller than the maximum TPR drawdown of -82.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGN and TPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGN | TPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.02% | -82.55% | +21.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -19.21% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.02% | -39.54% | -21.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -12.78% | +7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -27.74% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.20% | 7.44% | +0.76% |
Volatility
ZGN vs. TPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) is 12.99%, while Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that ZGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZGN | TPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 17.04% | -4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.12% | 28.29% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.49% | 40.80% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.94% | 40.25% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.94% | 44.23% | -3.29% |
Dividends
ZGN vs. TPR - Dividend Comparison
ZGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than TPR's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 1.11% | 1.17% | 2.14% | 3.53% | 2.89% | 1.23% | 1.09% | 5.01% | 3.00% | 3.06% | 3.85% | 4.13% |
ZGN Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. | 0.96% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZGN vs. TPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. and Tapestry, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZGN vs. TPR - Profitability Comparison
ZGN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. reported a gross profit of 550.02M and revenue of 981.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.0%.
TPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
ZGN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. reported an operating income of 93.59M and revenue of 981.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
TPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.50M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.
ZGN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. reported a net income of 55.09M and revenue of 981.93M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
TPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a net income of 343.80M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZGN and TPR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPR has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to ZGN (12.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZGN dropped -61.02% vs TPR's -82.55%.
TPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZGN and TPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer