ZGLD.SW vs. GC=F
ZGLD.SW (Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold Bullion, while GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset. Over the past 10 years, ZGLD.SW returned 10.72%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for GC=F. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ZGLD.SW vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZGLD.SW is traded in CHF, while GC=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GC=F values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGLD.SW achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 2.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ZGLD.SW has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 10.72%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 11.31% annualized return.
ZGLD.SW
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 3.70%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
GC=F
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- 25.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
ZGLD.SW vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGLD.SW Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF | 1.61% | 45.59% | 35.04% | 3.06% | 0.89% | -1.00% | 12.95% | 16.46% | -1.49% | 7.06% |
GC=F Gold Futures | 2.88% | 43.75% | 37.53% | 3.19% | 0.94% | -0.62% | 14.08% | 16.85% | -1.19% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGLD.SW and GC=F is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2007 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ZGLD.SW and GC=F has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZGLD.SW vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank
ZGLD.SW
GC=F
ZGLD.SW vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF (ZGLD.SW) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGLD.SW | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.69 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.18 | 4.25 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGLD.SW | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.06 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.92 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.73 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ZGLD.SW vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGLD.SW drawdown since its inception was -38.49%, roughly equal to the maximum GC=F drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLD.SW and GC=F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGLD.SW | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.49% | -37.49% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.91% | -16.01% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -16.01% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.94% | -16.01% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.94% | -16.01% | -0.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.57% | -14.39% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.22% | -13.72% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 6.45% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ZGLD.SW vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison
Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF (ZGLD.SW) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Gold Futures (GC=F) at 4.77%. This indicates that ZGLD.SW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZGLD.SW | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 4.77% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.85% | 21.98% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.01% | 25.40% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 17.10% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 15.44% | -1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZGLD.SW and GC=F have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ZGLD.SW and GC=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer