PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) and Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGI.TO achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than BND.TO's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ZGI.TO has outperformed BND.TO with an annualized return of 8.75%, while BND.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.00% annualized return.


ZGI.TO

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
13.70%
6M
9.75%
1Y
11.48%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
8.75%

BND.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.18%
1Y
6.14%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZGI.TO
BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF
13.70%0.94%25.35%-0.72%4.48%26.79%-10.51%25.17%-0.82%2.90%
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond Fund
0.89%7.23%7.49%8.45%-7.80%2.85%6.14%4.16%-0.91%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGI.TO and BND.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2015

0.14

The correlation between ZGI.TO and BND.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZGI.TO
BND.TO

Energy

43.9%

-

Utilities

43.0%

-

Real Estate

11.4%

-

Industrials

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

ZGI.TO
43.9%
BND.TO

-

Utilities

ZGI.TO
43.0%
BND.TO

-

Real Estate

ZGI.TO
11.4%
BND.TO

-

Industrials

ZGI.TO
1.7%
BND.TO

-

Basic Materials

ZGI.TO

-

BND.TO

-

Communication Services

ZGI.TO

-

BND.TO
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ZGI.TO

-

BND.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

ZGI.TO

-

BND.TO

-

Financial Services

ZGI.TO

-

BND.TO

-

Healthcare

ZGI.TO

-

BND.TO

-

Technology

ZGI.TO

-

BND.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGI.TO
ZGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ZGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

BND.TO
BND.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BND.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BND.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) and Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZGI.TOBND.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.17

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

8.87

-4.06

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the BND.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGI.TO and BND.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZGI.TOBND.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.02

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.64

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.59

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.61

+0.19

Drawdowns

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, which is greater than BND.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGI.TO and BND.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZGI.TOBND.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.76%

-16.55%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-2.84%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.07%

-4.46%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.70%

-12.23%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.76%

-16.55%

-18.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-0.45%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-2.07%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

0.69%

+1.80%

Volatility

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) at 1.35%. This indicates that ZGI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZGI.TOBND.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

1.35%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

2.52%

+7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

3.06%

+9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

5.10%

+8.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

5.15%

+10.78%

Dividends

ZGI.TO vs. BND.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than BND.TO's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond Fund
5.86%5.70%5.24%5.20%4.14%3.89%3.48%3.11%3.96%3.47%3.26%0.53%
ZGI.TO
BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF
2.32%2.72%2.75%3.25%2.94%2.98%3.66%2.78%2.92%2.53%3.21%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZGI.TO and BND.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZGI.TO and BND.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer