ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO).

ZGI.TO and CIF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZGI.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. CIF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Manulife Investment Management Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 27, 2008. Both ZGI.TO and CIF.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZGI.TO BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF	14.95%	0.94%	25.35%	-0.72%	4.48%	26.79%	-10.51%	25.17%	-0.82%	2.90%
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF	15.08%	14.45%	25.40%	14.65%	5.90%	17.73%	-0.62%	23.55%	-5.46%	2.34%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZGI.TO having a 14.95% return and CIF.TO slightly higher at 15.08%. Over the past 10 years, ZGI.TO has underperformed CIF.TO with an annualized return of 9.53%, while CIF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.

ZGI.TO

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 8.37%
• 3Y*: 13.12%
• 5Y*: 12.28%
• 10Y*: 9.53%

CIF.TO

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 15.08%
• 6M: 9.29%
• 1Y: 34.93%
• 3Y*: 22.51%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 12.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGI.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than CIF.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

CIF.TO

iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF

ZGI.TO

BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF

Return for Risk

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGI.TO

ZGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 31
ZGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
ZGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ZGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 28
ZGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ZGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 28

CIF.TO

CIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
CIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZGI.TO	CIF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	2.01	-1.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	2.53	-1.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.39	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	3.20	-2.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.31	11.47	-9.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the CIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGI.TO and CIF.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZGI.TO	CIF.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	2.01	-1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	1.20	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.76	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.51	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between ZGI.TO and CIF.TO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than CIF.TO's 1.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZGI.TO BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF	2.30%	2.72%	2.75%	3.25%	2.94%	2.98%	3.66%	2.78%	2.92%	2.53%	3.21%	2.90%
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF	1.92%	2.05%	2.84%	2.36%	2.53%	2.24%	2.06%	1.83%	2.45%	2.27%	1.81%	2.41%

Drawdowns

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum CIF.TO drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGI.TO and CIF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGI.TO	CIF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.76%	-42.37%	+7.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-11.10%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.70%	-20.40%	+3.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.76%	-42.37%	+7.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-2.13%	+1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-5.70%	+1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	3.10%	+1.26%

Volatility

ZGI.TO vs. CIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) is 3.87%, while iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that ZGI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGI.TO	CIF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	6.40%	-2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	12.05%	-3.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.91%	17.49%	-3.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.03%	14.32%	-1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	16.58%	-0.73%