ZETA vs. QQQM
ZETA (Zeta Global Holdings Corp.) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, ZETA returned 37.46%/yr vs 28.89%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZETA vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZETA achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
ZETA
- 1D
- -7.84%
- 1M
- 26.06%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 26.47%
- 1Y
- 76.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ZETA vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp. | 14.35% | 13.12% | 103.97% | 7.96% | -2.97% | -5.29% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 17.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZETA and QQQM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZETA vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
ZETA
QQQM
ZETA vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZETA | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.45 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 3.53 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 13.52 | -9.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZETA | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 2.65 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.85 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
ZETA vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZETA drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZETA and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZETA | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -35.04% | -34.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.37% | -11.96% | -28.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.01% | -22.70% | -47.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.66% | -0.20% | -36.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.03% | -8.25% | -25.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.66% | 3.11% | +16.55% |
Volatility
ZETA vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) has a higher volatility of 24.19% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that ZETA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZETA | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.19% | 4.48% | +19.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.30% | 12.05% | +36.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.49% | 15.91% | +57.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.21% | 22.24% | +49.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.21% | 22.12% | +50.09% |
Dividends
ZETA vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
ZETA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZETA and QQQM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZETA has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZETA dropped -70.01% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZETA and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer