PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZETA vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZETA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZETA achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.


ZETA

1D
-7.84%
1M
26.06%
YTD
14.35%
6M
26.47%
1Y
76.69%
3Y*
37.46%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZETA vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZETA
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
14.35%13.12%103.97%7.96%-2.97%-5.29%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%17.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ZETA and QQQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZETA vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZETA
ZETA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ZETA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZETA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZETA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ZETA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZETA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZETA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZETAQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.51

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

13.49

-9.58

ZETA vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZETA Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZETA and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZETAQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.64

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.41

-0.11

Drawdowns

ZETA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZETA drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZETA and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZETAQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-82.97%

+12.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.37%

-11.96%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.01%

-22.77%

-47.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.66%

-0.26%

-36.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.03%

-32.79%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.66%

3.11%

+16.55%

Volatility

ZETA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) has a higher volatility of 24.19% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that ZETA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZETAQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.19%

4.49%

+19.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.30%

12.10%

+36.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.49%

15.94%

+57.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.21%

22.38%

+49.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.21%

22.29%

+49.92%

Dividends

ZETA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

ZETA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
ZETA
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZETA and QQQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZETA has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZETA dropped -70.01% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZETA and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer